O cérebro fractal para a teoria cognitiva comportamental
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61411/rsc2025116118Palavras-chave:
fractais, sistema dinâmico complexo, teoria cognitiva comportamental, neurociêciaResumo
O cérebro humano é um órgão complexo e dinâmico que processa informações de maneira integrada e especializada, dependendo das necessidades e do ambiente. Neste trabalho, buscamos compreender o papel dos fractais na análise do cérebro, comparando as abordagens da neurociência e da teoria cognitiva comportamental (TCC) da psicologia. Fractais são padrões geométricos que apresentam uma estrutura repetitiva em diferentes escalas e podem ser encontrados em vários fenômenos naturais e artificiais. Na neurociência se utiliza, o conceito, fractais para estudar a atividade cerebral como um sistema complexo, que se adapta constantemente às mudanças do ambiente, formando estruturas neurais que armazenam e fortalecem as informações relevantes. A TCC pode usar fractais para analisar os padrões de comportamento da fisiologia cerebral, considerando os diferentes tipos de comportamento, pensamentos e emoções como concorrentes ou cooperadores para a prevalência da dinâmica, comparando tal fenômeno como um sistema dinâmico complexo. Este artigo pretende apresentar uma visão integrada dos conceitos de fractais na neurociência, bem como suas implicações para a TCC. O artigo conclui que é possível criar uma plataforma para melhor relacionar a função cerebral com estudos cognitivos, ampliando ainda mais as perspectivas dos já utilizados Sistemas Dinâmicos Complexos para conectar cognição e comportamento.
Referências
Bahls, S. C., & Bassetti, A. B. B. (2004). Terapia Cogniticocomportamentais: conceitos e pressupostos teóricos. https://www.cursosavante.com.br/cursos/curso368/conteudo8329.pdf
Baum, W. M. (2017). Understanding Behaviorism (3o ed). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119143673 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119143673
Boccaletti, S., Grebogi, C., Lai, Y.-C., Mancini, H., & Maza, D. (2000). The control of chaos: theory and applications. Physics Reports, 329(3), 103–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0370-1573(99)00096-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0370-1573(99)00096-4
Bogaert, A. F. (2015). Asexuality: What It Is and Why It Matters. The Journal of Sex Research, 52(4), 362–379. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2015.1015713 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2015.1015713
Burgess, N. (2014). The 2014 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine: A Spatial Model for Cognitive Neuroscience. Neuron, 84(6), 1120–1125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2014.12.009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2014.12.009
Buzsáki, G., & Mizuseki, K. (2014). The log-dynamic brain: how skewed distributions affect network operations. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 15(4), 264–278. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn3687 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn3687
Cabrera, F., Jiménez, Á. A., & Covarrubias, P. (2019). Timberlake’s behavior systems: A paradigm shift toward an ecological approach. Behavioural Processes, 167(English), 103892. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2019.103892 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2019.103892
Cabukovski, V., Rudolf, N. de M., & Mahmood, N. (1993). Measuring the fractal dimension of EEG signals: selection and adaptation of method for real-time analysis. https://www.witpress.com/elibrary/wit-transactions-on-biomedicine-and-health/1/13075
Callegaro, M. (2011). O Novo Inconsciente: Como a Terapia Cognitiva e as Neurociências Revolucionaram o Modelo do Processamento Mental. 1–312. https://m.grupoa.com.br/o-novo-inconsciente-p992786
Dalton, M. A., D’Souza, A., Lv, J., & Calamante, F. (2022). New insights into anatomical connectivity along the anterior–posterior axis of the human hippocampus using in vivo quantitative fibre tracking. eLife, 11. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.76143 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.76143
de Maat, S., de Jonghe, F., de Kraker, R., Leichsenring, F., Abbass, A., Luyten, P., Barber, J. P., Van, R., & Dekker, J. (2013). The Current State of the Empirical Evidence for Psychoanalysis. Harvard Review of Psychiatry, 21(3), 107–137. https://doi.org/10.1097/HRP.0b013e318294f5fd DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/HRP.0b013e318294f5fd
Drigas, A. S., Karyotaki, M., & Skianis, C. (2018). An Integrated Approach to Neuro-development, Neuroplasticity and Cognitive Improvement. International Journal of Recent Contributions from Engineering, Science & IT (iJES), 6(3), 4. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijes.v6i3.9034 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3991/ijes.v6i3.9034
Freud, S., & Chase, H. W. (1925). The origin and development of psychoanalysis. (H. W. Chase, Trad.). Em An outline of psychoanalysis. (p. 21–70). Modern Library. https://doi.org/10.1037/11350-001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/11350-001
Gibson, J. J. (1985). Conclusions from a century of research on sense perception. Em A century of psychology as science. (p. 224–230). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/10117-025 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/10117-025
Granic, I., & Patterson, G. R. (2006). Toward a comprehensive model of antisocial development: A dynamic systems approach. Psychological Review, 113(1), 101–131. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.113.1.101 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.113.1.101
Haimovici, A., Tagliazucchi, E., Balenzuela, P., & Chialvo, D. R. (2013). Brain Organization into Resting State Networks Emerges at Criticality on a Model of the Human Connectome. Physical Review Letters, 110(17), 178101. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.178101 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.178101
Hines, M. (2020). Neuroscience and Sex/Gender: Looking Back and Forward. The Journal of Neuroscience, 40(1), 37–43. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0750-19.2019 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0750-19.2019
Hunt, T., & Schooler, J. W. (2019). The Easy Part of the Hard Problem: A Resonance Theory of Consciousness. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2019.00378 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2019.00378
Jokić-Begić, N. (2010). Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy and Neuroscience: Towards Closer Integration. 235–254. https://hrcak.srce.hr/64665
Kahana, M. J. (2006). The Cognitive Correlates of Human Brain Oscillations. The Journal of Neuroscience, 26(6), 1669–1672. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3737-05c.2006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3737-05c.2006
Kahneman, D. (2012). The Human Side of Decision Making: Thinking Things Through with Daniel Kahneman, PhD. 13. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2144471
Kamal, S. M., Sim, S., Tee, R., Nathan, V., Aghasian, E., & Namazi, H. (2020). Decoding of the relationship between human brain activity and walking paths. Technology and Health Care, 28(4), 381–390. https://doi.org/10.3233/THC-191965 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/THC-191965
Kanton, S., Boyle, M. J., He, Z., Santel, M., Weigert, A., Sanchís-Calleja, F., Guijarro, P., Sidow, L., Fleck, J. S., Han, D., Qian, Z., Heide, M., Huttner, W. B., Khaitovich, P., Pääbo, S., Treutlein, B., & Camp, J. G. (2019). Organoid single-cell genomic atlas uncovers human-specific features of brain development. Nature, 574(7778), 418–422. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1654-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1654-9
Keijzer, F. (2005). Theoretical behaviorism meets embodied cognition: two theoretical analyses of behavior. Philosophical Psychology, 18(1), 123–143. https://doi.org/10.1080/09515080500085460 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09515080500085460
Knapp, P., & Beck, A. T. (2008). Fundamentos, modelos conceituais, aplicações e pesquisa da terapia cognitiva. Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria, 30(suppl 2), s54–s64. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-44462008000600002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-44462008000600002
Lau, Z. J., Pham, T., Chen, S. H. A., & Makowski, D. (2022). Brain entropy, fractal dimensions and predictability: A review of complexity measures for EEG in healthy and neuropsychiatric populations. European Journal of Neuroscience, 56(7), 5047–5069. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejn.15800 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ejn.15800
Lebedev, M. A., Ossadtchi, A., Mill, N. A., Urpí, N. A., Cervera, M. R., & Nicolelis, M. A. L. (2019). Analysis of neuronal ensemble activity reveals the pitfalls and shortcomings of rotation dynamics. Scientific Reports, 9(1), 18978. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-54760-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-54760-4
Lima, A. P. de. (2010). O modelo estrutural de Freud e o cérebro: uma proposta de integração entre a psicanálise e a neurofisiologia. Archives of Clinical Psychiatry (São Paulo), 37(6), 280–287. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0101-60832010000600005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0101-60832010000600005
Mandelbrot, B. B. (1982). 4. The Many Faces of Scaling: Fractals, Geometry of Nature, and Economics. Em Self-Organization and Dissipative Structures (1o ed, p. 91–109). University of Texas Press. https://doi.org/10.7560/703544-005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7560/703544-005
Mansell, W., & Marken, R. S. (2015). The Origins and Future of Control Theory in Psychology. Review of General Psychology, 19(4), 425–430. https://doi.org/10.1037/gpr0000057 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/gpr0000057
Mattei, T. A. (2014). Unveiling complexity: non-linear and fractal analysis in neuroscience and cognitive psychology. Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fncom.2014.00017 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fncom.2014.00017
Meunier, D., Lambiotte, R., & Bullmore, E. T. (2010). Modular and Hierarchically Modular Organization of Brain Networks. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 4, 1. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2010.00200 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2010.00200
Pietschnig, J., Penke, L., Wicherts, J. M., Zeiler, M., & Voracek, M. (2015). Meta-analysis of associations between human brain volume and intelligence differences: How strong are they and what do they mean? Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 57, 411–432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2015.09.017 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2015.09.017
Prochazka, A., & Ellaway, P. (2012). Sensory Systems in the Control of Movement. Em Comprehensive Physiology (p. 2615–2627). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/cphy.c100086 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/cphy.c100086
Rabinovich, M. I., Huerta, R., Varona, P., & Afraimovich, V. S. (2008). Transient Cognitive Dynamics, Metastability, and Decision Making. PLoS Computational Biology, 4(5), e1000072. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000072 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000072
Richardson, M. J., Dale, R., & Marsh, K. L. (2014). Complex Dynamical Systems in Social and Personality Psychology. Em Handbook of Research Methods in Social and Personality Psychology (p. 253–282). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511996481.015 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511996481.015
Shine, J. M., Breakspear, M., Bell, P. T., Ehgoetz Martens, K. A., Shine, R., Koyejo, O., Sporns, O., & Poldrack, R. A. (2019). Human cognition involves the dynamic integration of neural activity and neuromodulatory systems. Nature Neuroscience, 22(2), 289–296. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-018-0312-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-018-0312-0
Singer, W. (2021). Recurrent dynamics in the cerebral cortex: Integration of sensory evidence with stored knowledge. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(33). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2101043118 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2101043118
Skinner, B. F. (1936). The Verbal Summator and a Method for the Study of Latent Speech. The Journal of Psychology, 2(1), 71–107. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.1936.9917445 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.1936.9917445
Thelen, E., & Smith, L. B. (1994). A Dynamic Systems Approach to the Development of Cognition and Action. The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/2524.001.0001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/2524.001.0001
Timberlake, W. (1993). BEHAVIOR SYSTEMS AND REINFORCEMENT: AN INTEGRATIVE APPROACH. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 60(1), 105–128. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1993.60-105 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1993.60-105
Xu, Y., Long, X., Feng, J., & Gong, P. (2023). Interacting spiral wave patterns underlie complex brain dynamics and are related to cognitive processing. Nature Human Behaviour, 7(7), 1196–1215. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-023-01626-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-023-01626-5
Zimmern, V. (2020). Why Brain Criticality Is Clinically Relevant: A Scoping Review. Frontiers in Neural Circuits, 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fncir.2020.00054 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fncir.2020.00054
Publicado
Edição
Seção
Categorias
Licença
Copyright (c) 2025 Revista Sociedade Científica
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
